<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 Predictions for the IT business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stevestreeting.com/2008/12/28/2009-predictions-for-the-it-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stevestreeting.com/2008/12/28/2009-predictions-for-the-it-business/</link>
	<description>Man bites Ogre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:49:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: KungFooMasta</title>
		<link>http://www.stevestreeting.com/2008/12/28/2009-predictions-for-the-it-business/comment-page-1/#comment-247942</link>
		<dc:creator>KungFooMasta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 23:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevestreeting.com/?p=1123#comment-247942</guid>
		<description>Regarding the driver aspect, its mainly a problem only when I try to help friends/family with their machine, when they&#039;ve got so much spyware/viruses that a reformat would be the best solution.  Most people don&#039;t even know what drivers are, and additionally a lot of manufacturers don&#039;t give you all the CD&#039;s unless you request them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the driver aspect, its mainly a problem only when I try to help friends/family with their machine, when they&#8217;ve got so much spyware/viruses that a reformat would be the best solution.  Most people don&#8217;t even know what drivers are, and additionally a lot of manufacturers don&#8217;t give you all the CD&#8217;s unless you request them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.stevestreeting.com/2008/12/28/2009-predictions-for-the-it-business/comment-page-1/#comment-247921</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 11:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevestreeting.com/?p=1123#comment-247921</guid>
		<description>To be honest when I reinstall a machine it&#039;s not the drivers that take the time, it&#039;s the zillions of apps (and their service packs - I&#039;m looking at you Visual Studio) that I have to reinstall that&#039;s the problem. This puts me off reinstalling my machines very often!

I would agree to an extent about the user-friendliness. I do think, however, that the problems with Vista usability (UAC particularly) come from historical design mistakes in the Windows line so in fact they&#039;re as much XP&#039;s (and predecessors) fault as Vistas - Vista was just trying to patch over the holes. I still think that half the trouble was trying to sit on the fence between backwards compatibility and major change, and achieving neither very well. 

I also think that Mac OS X does the best job of combining user friendliness and advanced usage of any OS I&#039;ve used. I can give one of these to absolutely anyone, there&#039;s no manual driver installs to worry about, the UI is consistent and easy to use, but underneath it is a full Unix-compatible base that I can do much more with out of the box as a tech than I can with any version of Windows. Perfect combo, definitely the standard setter IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest when I reinstall a machine it&#8217;s not the drivers that take the time, it&#8217;s the zillions of apps (and their service packs &#8211; I&#8217;m looking at you Visual Studio) that I have to reinstall that&#8217;s the problem. This puts me off reinstalling my machines very often!</p>
<p>I would agree to an extent about the user-friendliness. I do think, however, that the problems with Vista usability (UAC particularly) come from historical design mistakes in the Windows line so in fact they&#8217;re as much XP&#8217;s (and predecessors) fault as Vistas &#8211; Vista was just trying to patch over the holes. I still think that half the trouble was trying to sit on the fence between backwards compatibility and major change, and achieving neither very well. </p>
<p>I also think that Mac OS X does the best job of combining user friendliness and advanced usage of any OS I&#8217;ve used. I can give one of these to absolutely anyone, there&#8217;s no manual driver installs to worry about, the UI is consistent and easy to use, but underneath it is a full Unix-compatible base that I can do much more with out of the box as a tech than I can with any version of Windows. Perfect combo, definitely the standard setter IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KungFooMasta</title>
		<link>http://www.stevestreeting.com/2008/12/28/2009-predictions-for-the-it-business/comment-page-1/#comment-247891</link>
		<dc:creator>KungFooMasta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevestreeting.com/?p=1123#comment-247891</guid>
		<description>The one great thing Vista had over XP was driver support.  In XP you either kept a CD of drivers that came with your mobo or tower, or you had to figure out what kind of hardware you have, find the manufacturer&#039;s website and download it. (Which means you have to have support for your LAN/wireless card already)  In Vista the majority of drivers are installed for you, so even after a fresh reformat your rig is somewhat usable.  Also I think xp will not be supported much longer, I don&#039;t remember the date.

My one issue with Microsoft&#039;s new OSes in general is that they are very much catering to the computer illiterate person, trying to make it easier and easier to use.  This sounds good, but it means a lot more dialogs and clicking for the advanced user.  I also don&#039;t like linux for the opposite reason, you really have to know where to go to install and configure the machine the way you want.  I think XP was a good middle between the 2 extremes.  It would be cool if there were 2 UI modes for Windows 7: noob/advanced.

I agree with your comments on Android.  The first phone didn&#039;t make any real sparks and appeals only to developers, which is a minority in the mobile phone space.  I think late 2009/2010 there will be some really good phones on the market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one great thing Vista had over XP was driver support.  In XP you either kept a CD of drivers that came with your mobo or tower, or you had to figure out what kind of hardware you have, find the manufacturer&#8217;s website and download it. (Which means you have to have support for your LAN/wireless card already)  In Vista the majority of drivers are installed for you, so even after a fresh reformat your rig is somewhat usable.  Also I think xp will not be supported much longer, I don&#8217;t remember the date.</p>
<p>My one issue with Microsoft&#8217;s new OSes in general is that they are very much catering to the computer illiterate person, trying to make it easier and easier to use.  This sounds good, but it means a lot more dialogs and clicking for the advanced user.  I also don&#8217;t like linux for the opposite reason, you really have to know where to go to install and configure the machine the way you want.  I think XP was a good middle between the 2 extremes.  It would be cool if there were 2 UI modes for Windows 7: noob/advanced.</p>
<p>I agree with your comments on Android.  The first phone didn&#8217;t make any real sparks and appeals only to developers, which is a minority in the mobile phone space.  I think late 2009/2010 there will be some really good phones on the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.stevestreeting.com/2008/12/28/2009-predictions-for-the-it-business/comment-page-1/#comment-247872</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 10:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevestreeting.com/?p=1123#comment-247872</guid>
		<description>I think Google&#039;s headliner in 2009 will be Android, given the confluence of mobile tech and open source. However, I do think that the devices themselves will continue to be underwhelming compared to the iPhone for the next year - the devices so far are certainly pretty clunky. Nevertheless, if they play it right after a year of maturation, 2010 may be the year for Android to shine. So long as they don&#039;t become the desktop Linux of mobile phones (ie fragmented and appealing mainly to technical audiences), it could be interesting.  

On Windows 7, the question is not whether it&#039;s justifiable over Vista, but whether it&#039;s justifiable over XP or OS X - that&#039;s where the real choice is in practice. Of course people with Vista are going to upgrade, just to get their performance back to where it was on XP on the same machine. You really need to write Vista out of the equation and concentrate on the people that never &#039;upgraded&#039; to it in the first place, or who are considering or have already switched to a Mac. There are also those who have &#039;switched&#039; to an eeePC or iPhone - traditionalists may scoff, but there&#039;s an increasing number of people for whom these devices are actually enough for their personal needs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Google&#8217;s headliner in 2009 will be Android, given the confluence of mobile tech and open source. However, I do think that the devices themselves will continue to be underwhelming compared to the iPhone for the next year &#8211; the devices so far are certainly pretty clunky. Nevertheless, if they play it right after a year of maturation, 2010 may be the year for Android to shine. So long as they don&#8217;t become the desktop Linux of mobile phones (ie fragmented and appealing mainly to technical audiences), it could be interesting.  </p>
<p>On Windows 7, the question is not whether it&#8217;s justifiable over Vista, but whether it&#8217;s justifiable over XP or OS X &#8211; that&#8217;s where the real choice is in practice. Of course people with Vista are going to upgrade, just to get their performance back to where it was on XP on the same machine. You really need to write Vista out of the equation and concentrate on the people that never &#8216;upgraded&#8217; to it in the first place, or who are considering or have already switched to a Mac. There are also those who have &#8216;switched&#8217; to an eeePC or iPhone &#8211; traditionalists may scoff, but there&#8217;s an increasing number of people for whom these devices are actually enough for their personal needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KungFooMasta</title>
		<link>http://www.stevestreeting.com/2008/12/28/2009-predictions-for-the-it-business/comment-page-1/#comment-247825</link>
		<dc:creator>KungFooMasta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 18:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevestreeting.com/?p=1123#comment-247825</guid>
		<description>What are your predictions for Google?

And regarding Windows 7, the performance and system requirements alone would justify buying it over Vista.  For me at least, the switch is a no brainer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are your predictions for Google?</p>
<p>And regarding Windows 7, the performance and system requirements alone would justify buying it over Vista.  For me at least, the switch is a no brainer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Posts about Web 2.0 as of December 29, 2008 &#124; The Lessnau Lounge</title>
		<link>http://www.stevestreeting.com/2008/12/28/2009-predictions-for-the-it-business/comment-page-1/#comment-247822</link>
		<dc:creator>Posts about Web 2.0 as of December 29, 2008 &#124; The Lessnau Lounge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevestreeting.com/?p=1123#comment-247822</guid>
		<description>[...] . They all compile information about Web sites and make that information searchable by users. How   2009 Predictions for the IT business - stevestreeting.com 12/28/2008 So, 2008 is almost done and 2009 rapidly hoves into view &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] . They all compile information about Web sites and make that information searchable by users. How   2009 Predictions for the IT business &#8211; stevestreeting.com 12/28/2008 So, 2008 is almost done and 2009 rapidly hoves into view &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LewieP</title>
		<link>http://www.stevestreeting.com/2008/12/28/2009-predictions-for-the-it-business/comment-page-1/#comment-247787</link>
		<dc:creator>LewieP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 21:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevestreeting.com/?p=1123#comment-247787</guid>
		<description>MOBILE DEVICES</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MOBILE DEVICES</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

