<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for SteveStreeting.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stevestreeting.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stevestreeting.com</link>
	<description>Software developer, occasionally staying on topic</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 10:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apache to Nginx &amp; PHP-FPM : part 1 by stevestreeting</title>
		<link>http://www.stevestreeting.com/2012/05/09/apache-to-nginx-php-fpm-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-395878</link>
		<dc:creator>stevestreeting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 10:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevestreeting.com/?p=3114#comment-395878</guid>
		<description>Yeah, old CGI forked a process for every request, which was obviously not very scalable! I&#039;ve always run Apache in-process modules and this is the first time I&#039;ve used FastCGI, and the FPM implementation seems really good - you have essentially two services each actively managing their load via resource pools, meaning everything is a lot more responsive than Apache. I had to have a cron job  on Ogre just to check the status of Apache periodically and bounce the server if it looked like it got itself in a knot, because noa mount of tuning the connection parameters ever seemed to cover everything. I&#039;m hoping this is now history!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, old CGI forked a process for every request, which was obviously not very scalable! I&#8217;ve always run Apache in-process modules and this is the first time I&#8217;ve used FastCGI, and the FPM implementation seems really good &#8211; you have essentially two services each actively managing their load via resource pools, meaning everything is a lot more responsive than Apache. I had to have a cron job  on Ogre just to check the status of Apache periodically and bounce the server if it looked like it got itself in a knot, because noa mount of tuning the connection parameters ever seemed to cover everything. I&#8217;m hoping this is now history!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apache to Nginx &amp; PHP-FPM : part 1 by Peter Newman</title>
		<link>http://www.stevestreeting.com/2012/05/09/apache-to-nginx-php-fpm-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-395873</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Newman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 04:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevestreeting.com/?p=3114#comment-395873</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s really nice to see some new competition in the HTTPD space. I&#039;ve always gone with Apache because that was The Thing You Use, back when it was 1.6 or so. But I&#039;m hearing NGINX is good, and one of our servers uses it as a front-end to Ruby (which runs as a daemon as well). Apparently Apache is now making a push towards comparing better against NGINX in terms of footprint and speed, which just benefits everyone.

I&#039;ve also been hearing a lot of good about FastCGI. Last time I played with that sort of thing was when it was just CGI, and it seemed rather dodgy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really nice to see some new competition in the HTTPD space. I&#8217;ve always gone with Apache because that was The Thing You Use, back when it was 1.6 or so. But I&#8217;m hearing NGINX is good, and one of our servers uses it as a front-end to Ruby (which runs as a daemon as well). Apparently Apache is now making a push towards comparing better against NGINX in terms of footprint and speed, which just benefits everyone.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also been hearing a lot of good about FastCGI. Last time I played with that sort of thing was when it was just CGI, and it seemed rather dodgy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Building a new technical documentation tool chain by How to Setup AsciiDoc, Pygment and FOP on Windows for Beautiful PDF and XHTML Documentation &#124; Francis Shanahan[.com]</title>
		<link>http://www.stevestreeting.com/2010/03/07/building-a-new-technical-documentation-tool-chain/comment-page-1/#comment-395849</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Setup AsciiDoc, Pygment and FOP on Windows for Beautiful PDF and XHTML Documentation &#124; Francis Shanahan[.com]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 17:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevestreeting.com/?p=2592#comment-395849</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.stevestreeting.com/2010/03/07/building-a-new-technical-documentation-tool-chain/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.stevestreeting.com/2010/03/07/building-a-new-technical-documentation-tool-chain/" rel="nofollow">http://www.stevestreeting.com/2010/03/07/building-a-new-technical-documentation-tool-chain/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Work 2.0 &#8211; the interruptible programmer by SteveStreeting.com &#187; Oh no, not a &#8216;Best of&#8217; collection?</title>
		<link>http://www.stevestreeting.com/2010/09/04/work-2-0/comment-page-2/#comment-395796</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveStreeting.com &#187; Oh no, not a &#8216;Best of&#8217; collection?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 12:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevestreeting.com/?p=2816#comment-395796</guid>
		<description>[...] Work 2.0 – the interruptible programmer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Work 2.0 – the interruptible programmer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blog revamp by stevestreeting</title>
		<link>http://www.stevestreeting.com/2012/04/29/blog-revamp/comment-page-1/#comment-395781</link>
		<dc:creator>stevestreeting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevestreeting.com/?p=3107#comment-395781</guid>
		<description>Easy fix :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Easy fix <img src='http://www.stevestreeting.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blog revamp by stevestreeting</title>
		<link>http://www.stevestreeting.com/2012/04/29/blog-revamp/comment-page-1/#comment-395779</link>
		<dc:creator>stevestreeting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 08:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevestreeting.com/?p=3107#comment-395779</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I didn&#039;t spot this because I&#039;d already viewed all the links :) Definitely a few style tweaks to be done still.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I didn&#8217;t spot this because I&#8217;d already viewed all the links <img src='http://www.stevestreeting.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Definitely a few style tweaks to be done still.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blog revamp by Kieran Senior</title>
		<link>http://www.stevestreeting.com/2012/04/29/blog-revamp/comment-page-1/#comment-395777</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieran Senior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 07:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevestreeting.com/?p=3107#comment-395777</guid>
		<description>The comment font is tiny, probably worth upping it a few pixels :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comment font is tiny, probably worth upping it a few pixels <img src='http://www.stevestreeting.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blog revamp by Joël Lamotte</title>
		<link>http://www.stevestreeting.com/2012/04/29/blog-revamp/comment-page-1/#comment-395773</link>
		<dc:creator>Joël Lamotte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 01:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevestreeting.com/?p=3107#comment-395773</guid>
		<description> Nice theme, i was looking for something similar but lost faith. Maybe I&#039;ll use a modified version of this theme...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Nice theme, i was looking for something similar but lost faith. Maybe I&#8217;ll use a modified version of this theme&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blog revamp by spacegaier</title>
		<link>http://www.stevestreeting.com/2012/04/29/blog-revamp/comment-page-1/#comment-395772</link>
		<dc:creator>spacegaier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 22:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevestreeting.com/?p=3107#comment-395772</guid>
		<description>Hi Steve,

I find it rather hard to spot links in that new theme, next to impossible since they only have a very, very slight gray rectangle behind them. Once you click on them the font becomes a light blue which would be nice to have as the link indicator in the first place ;) .

Cheers,
spacegaier</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steve,</p>
<p>I find it rather hard to spot links in that new theme, next to impossible since they only have a very, very slight gray rectangle behind them. Once you click on them the font becomes a light blue which would be nice to have as the link indicator in the first place <img src='http://www.stevestreeting.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  .</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
spacegaier</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Realisation: blogs are still where it&#8217;s at by SteveStreeting.com &#187; Blog revamp</title>
		<link>http://www.stevestreeting.com/2012/04/24/realisation-blogs-are-still-where-its-at/comment-page-1/#comment-395770</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveStreeting.com &#187; Blog revamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 15:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevestreeting.com/?p=3088#comment-395770</guid>
		<description>[...] I promised, I&#8217;ve given this blog a bit of an overhaul in anticipation of posting more often again. For [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I promised, I&#8217;ve given this blog a bit of an overhaul in anticipation of posting more often again. For [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

